Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobiacs
The title of this post refers to the 64th thing, which is the name for people who fear the number 666.
Also fascinating was the information in item number 68, where experts ruled that the "the egg came first."
Luckily, I remembered a great piece of social networking software that would help with the project. LibraryThing.com provides one with an easy to use cataloguing tool and lets you share your love of books with a larger reading community. With over 7 million books catalogued and over 100,000 members LibraryThing lets you browse the huge catalogue for your favourite authors. If you enter your own collection, a simple process that involves typing in an author or title or ISBN and finding your book in a list from Amazon.com or the Library of Congress or some other major library –then just “click” to enter -- you can look at collections that are similar to your own to see what someone else might be enjoying. The site will also generate reading suggestions based on what you have in your collection. You can use RSS Feeds or widgets to add random lists of your books to a Blog, just like the one on the right. Members of the community offer reviews and ratings of books and the Zeitgeist Page offers lists such as highest rated authors and most reviewed books.
While the actual physical arrangement of your books on your bookshelves may reflect the unique connections between the books that only you can truly appreciate, LibraryThing.com lets you create virtual order with electronic alphabetically listed authors or titles or genres. And, keyword tags give you the opportunity to sort into any number of categories.
While busily engaged in the process of cataloguing my collection my daughters, ever curious, were drawn by my interest and were themselves immediately hooked on LibraryThing. There are definitely two more avid readers in the house. Maybe there are two more librarians too?
When I first considered this assignment I thought that
Garrett, Jesse James. (18 February 2005)"
The reasons for using a PAC in a library are as vast as the reasons for using a computer in the home or office. The library, therefore, must be able to guarantee that the PACs are available on an ongoing basis. That is, they must operate relatively free of breakdowns, over long periods of time, and with different users (Sendze). Constant breakdowns would be expensive for the library because of increased maintenance costs. Also, it would be an inconvenience for the users if there were fewer PACs available. With a live CD operating system the computer would be less likely to be subject to inadvertent alterations by novice or malicious users.
As with more traditional library functions the library’s PAC policies and procedures must be able to ensure user privacy. As has been suggested in class, the possibility of legal action might exist if a library offers services and, as a result of those services, a user has his/her transactions/privacy/passwords compromised. The library must also maintain the integrity of the information contained in the computer system: staff information, OPAC and other library service information. A “terms of use” page where the library can warn patrons against certain uses of the technology and where they can alert patrons to potential risks associated with use of a PAC is helpful. The terms of use contract may provide some measure of security from legal action if acceptance of the terms implies an understanding and acceptance of the risks. However, these instruments are probably no more useful as legal protection than the little warnings printed on the back of hockey tickets that attempt to reduce liability should you be injured by a flying puck.
The live CD seems to offer a reasonable likelihood of a secure computing environment. From the users point of view I would prefer to carry the secure operating system with me, perhaps on a memory key, where I can load my preferences, email and other utilities and not have to worry about what might be on the PC and where my information might be going. To be able to use this technology one would have to be able to reboot the PC. Would libraries be amenable to people doing this to their machines? I tend to believe there would be a great deal of hesitation.
There are numerous commercial resources available to libraries to secure their PACs. CybraryN Solutions , Userful’s DiscoverStation, LockDown Rx by Horizon DataSYS Inc., and Faronics Anti-Executable and Deep Freeze offer security, management and patron authentication software for PACs. The software makers suggest that their products will block “unwanted content access, downloads, and system changes… [And they are] virtually immune to all viruses.” (Userful) However, it occurs to me that anything that suggests that it is “the standard in bulletproof disk protection” is simply inviting a challenge to have their systems hacked. Ubuntu provides the services that the proprietary software sells only it does so free of charge. Ubuntu provides immunity to virtually all viruses without the hassle of looking for and downloading all of the anti-viral fixes and updates that would be necessary for a software solution.
Works Consulted
Moore, S. R. (2001). Libraries to labs: Managing public access computer labs in an academic library environment. The Reference Librarian, (74), 207-220.
Sendze, M. (2006) The battle to secure our public access computers. Computers in Libraries, 26(1), 10-16.
Wayne, R. (2004) An overview of public access software management tools for libraries. Computers in Libraries 24(1) 24-6, 28-30.